Bush's cheery holiday press conference

From yesterday's twinkling presser, via the rabid moonbat surrendermonkeys at the NYTimes.

On being the Decider:
QUESTION: But beyond that, sir, have you questioned your own decisions?
BUSH: No, I haven't questioned whether or not it was right to take Saddam Hussein out.

The inevitable question on Mary Cheney:
BUSH: I know Mary. And I like her. I know she's going to be a fine, loving mother. I'm not going to call on you again.

And what has he learned?
QUESTION:[A]fter five years now of war, what lessons will you take into the final two years of your presidency?
BUSH: Well, look, absolutely, that it is important for us, to be successful going forward, is to analyze that which went wrong.

You know, I mean just know that he was carefully coached on the use of the passive voice in that answer. Look at it again. No person or entity "did" anything wrong; wrong things just went and happened.

Particularly in the Lower Ninth Ward. Thanks, your Excellency, for the insightful analysis.

Affordable housing meets PowerPoint in Portsmouth

Update: I'm not going to edit this post, because it's more than a year old, but I do want to point out that this was a quick, initial response, and that it is not accurate. While my argument about year-round residents may be valid in a perfect world, it fails when viewed in light of Rhode Island's tax cap.

Eileen Spillane down the road in RI12 picks up on a Newport Daily News story about the recent report of the Portsmouth Economic Development Committee. The NDN story apparently focused not on the good work the committee did, or their plans for 2007, but on one extremely stupid chart they presented which suggested that the most profitable housing sector to pursue was "Recreational/Residential" (i.e., houses for rich people who only live here part time and don't use so many services.) As Eileen points out:

"Responsible economic development requires affordable housing for its workers. While Newport shoulders much of this for the State, what about Portsmouth? It's time that other towns & cities stepped up to the plate. I proposed the State providing incentives for communities to do so."RI12

EDC gain/loss chartHere's the offending chart. (Click for larger view) Based on the numbers, developments like Carnegie Abbey look good on paper, because residents only use them for part of the year, and absorb only 43 cents of services for every tax dollar they contribute. Residential households, on this chart, project below the line, "costing" 16 cents more than they produce in taxes.

Now there are at least two things wrong with this kind of analysis, and both of them are pretty egregious. On a practical level, saying that part-time residents are economically attractive does not speak to their total lifecycle cost. While they are less likely to have kids in the schools or require municipal services, they are also less invested in supporting the town. They don't pay sales tax here full time, don't shop here full time, don't raise families here. I'm not saying that's good or bad; this is not a criticism of part-time residents. It is, however, a critique of the snapshot analysis in this chart versus a long-range picture. The uncaptured cumulative local revenue (and its velocity multiplier) need to be subtracted from that alleged 57 cents. Nor does this analysis attempt to quantify the cost of less-than-full community participation, an intangible to be sure, but that's what consultants get paid to operationalize.

But even worse, and the reason charts like this help towns make dumb decisions about housing is the tacit metaphor: Government is a business. That's just flat wrong.

Let me say it again. Government is not a freaking business. You are not "losing money" on residential homeowners, as if they were some unprofitable assembly line you could outsource to Mumbai. Governments provide municipal services because they serve the common good, not because they turn a profit, and we forget that at our peril. Words matter, and the EDC would do well to think more carefully about them in the future.

This dumb chart and the NDN pickup is particularly unfortunate, because the rest of the work the EDC has been doing — promoting Wind Power, developing the Town Center project, and working to attract businesses to Portsmouth — have been laudable.

Shout out to Eileen's RI12 for pointing out this article.

"Moving through matter with Buckaroo Banzai"

The wonderful thing about the Web is that nothing ever goes away. A dedicated fan dug up a technical paper explaining the physics of Buckaroo Banzai, written by UC Berkeley scientist Cary I. Sneider in 1984. Here's a peek...

"[L]et's take Buckaroo's invention for a spin and see how it works. First, the Overthruster produces colliding beams of electrons and positrons. These, in turn, produce copious quantities of intermediate vector bosons which are separated and focused with superconducting magnets. When focused on solid matter, the beam produces a small region of high energy density. Inside the target, spontaneous symmetry breaking imparts mass to the photons, reducing the range of the electromagnetic force to far less than a quadrillionth of a centimeter. From this small region a shock wave of broken symmetry propagates outward. Behind the shock wave matter interacts only weakly, providing for Buckaroo and his jet car to move through matter. The car must travel very fast (at least 700 miles per hour) to allow free passage before the material reverts to its normal state."Geekazon, via Slashdot

Not familiar with the adventures of this swashbuckling particle physicist-surgeon-rock star? You can learn more at Wikipedia, IMDB, or go straight to the horse's mouth, the Banzai Institute.

"It's your hand, Buckaroo." — Dr. Hikita

PCC files suit

According to the Newport Daily News the PCC has filed a motion to enter Portsmouth's Caruolo suit, on the grounds that the Town (the defendants) will not adequately protect their interests.

"PCC, in the court filings, reiterates its claim that the School Committee failed to meet the statutory requirements of filing a Caruolo suit. Not only that, the group argues, the Caruolo Act itself is preempted by the Portsmouth town charter, which includes the prescribed "tent" meeting process.

The schools' suit and the Town Council's post-tent-meeting vote to maintain the schools' budget appropriation were actions made outside of either board's authority, PCC argues. The tent meeting vote, the group maintains, is the "ultimate and conclusive appropriating authority" in Portsmouth."Newport Daily News

Town Council meeting in executive session tonight. Going to be interesting to see how this pushes the vote, one way or the other.

Portsmouth "Inconvenient Truth" party

An Inconvenient TruthJust got back from a wonderful house party in Portsmouth where we watched AIT, talked about global warming, and had a grand old progressive time.

It was a small group -- our host, Jay who opened his beautiful house in Common Fence Point, and a couple of his friends and neighbors Nancy, Doreen, and Joe. Jack had been asking if he could come, and after I cleared it with Jay, he came along and had fun (although he really, really didn't like the part of the film that talked about the melting polar ice caps threatening polar bears. He really likes polar bears.)

We had a good conversation about the kinds of things that need to happen -- action on the state and national level, carbon trading, revising the insane CAFE standards, taxing fossil fuels proportionate to their environmental impact, and, of course, who looks electable in '08.

There was a bit of a glitch dialing into the call with Al Gore, and we never did connect after a few tries on the conference number. The interactive map at the MoveOn site had an "ask a question" feature, and Jack got a laugh by suggesting we ask for a number that worked.

It was very cool, however, to see the map all lit up with circles of light, each representing a group around the country watching the movie, talking with each other. A very connected feeling.

Couldn't make it to a party? Take a minute to send a postcard to your Congresspeople.

"Sweet, sweet projectile action..." Radar's worst toys ever

Just in time for holiday shopping, Radar Magazine has put together a top-10 list of the most dangerous toys every released on to the American consumer. It's a trip down memory lane (which all too often ended in the ER.)

From the stark menace of Lawn Darts to the ethereal, whirling faery-death-blades of the SkyDancer, take a journey back to simpler times. My personal favorite is Creepy Crawlers. Our 7-year-old got the contemporary version for his birthday, and it's more like an Easy-Bake oven: heated by a light bulb with a safety interlock to keep you from opening the cooking chamber. But when I was a kid, product liability hadn't been invented yet...

"Nothing says safety like an open hot plate. And nothing says fun like using that open hot plate to create molten, rubbery insects you can throw at your sister while narrowly avoiding setting the house ablaze. The 1964 Creepy Crawler Thingmaker from Mattel, a distant cousin of today's Creepy Crawler toys, came with a series of molds, tubes of "plastigoop," and an open-faced frier, which could heat up to a nerve-searing 310 degrees."
Radar Magazine via Slashdot

Radar's light tone masks the grim reality that about 20 kids are killed, and over 200,000 injured each year, while using toys. Yes, that's 200k visits to the hospital; you can easily imagine that the actual number of unreported injuries is significantly higher. Visit the Consumer Product Safety Commission for the latest data.

Conveniently, the CPSC has massaged refined these statistics to exclude child death and injury on ATVs. You can scroll down their data page to get the stats: a grim 120 Americans younger than 16 killed last year and 40,000 injured seriously enough to visit an emergency room.

Prithee, sirah, woulds't thou open my can of worms?

Agin yearbook photoPortsmouth High School (PHS) senior Patrick Agin poses for yearbook photo holding a sword, demonstrating his avocation, the Society for Creative Anachronism (SCA). PHS Principal Littlefield spikes the picture, making the unfortunate concession that Agin could run it as a paid ad. Portsmouth's own Patriot mascot, depicted in the yearbook, carries a musket. Patrick's mother, Heidi Farrington, calls in the ACLU which, naturally, sues. The yearbook is due to go to press, threatening to hold up delivery to graduating seniors. Unclear what the School Committee or the Superintendent think, because by the time it comes up at a meeting, the suit has been filed and nobody can talk.

You don't truly know what you believe in until two of your values are in conflict. It's taken me a while to think through and craft my response to this miasma. While I'm an unwavering supporter of the Portsmouth Schools, and there is more to this story than has been released in the press — as those in the community with long memories can attest — at the end of the day, Littlefield just missed the bus on this one.

This week, I downloaded and read the PHS handbook, and didn't find a specific regulation on yearbook photos, unless their theory is that the one line about sanctioned activities ("co- curricular activity is considered an extension of the school day and the rules of conduct that apply to the normal school day apply to the activity") triggers their "zero weapons" clause (Policy 5700), an argument which I find tenuous. It seems more like the Principal is on a witch hunt, seeing weapons where there is only historical re-enactment.

As a card-carrying member of the ACLU and EFF, I'm deeply troubled. Additionally, in my a life as an sf fan and writer, I've hung out with many members of the SCA, and I have never, ever, felt threatened. SCA folk are uniformly sensitive to those around them when it comes to weapons. I even took the trouble of contacting the SCA media relations guy, who confirmed that Agin was not breaking any of the organization's weapons rules.

Now timing is everything, and the paranoid among us might wonder: Why here, why now? This is almost a replay of a similar case in Wisconsin involving a rifle and Confederate flag. If one were setting the School Department up for a trainwreck at a critical time when one wanted to peel off left-leaning support, one could hardly imagine a better scenario. Indeed, PCC school board member Doug Wilkey managed to get himself quoted in the AP story. But I have learned to be cautious in imputing malice as an explanation where mere stupidity can suffice. (I think that's called 'Occam's Sledgehammer...')

Bottom line: Littlefield needs to back down. It does a disservice to the people of Portsmouth to have our town dragged through the national press like this. This needs to be resolved. Now.

See the RI ACLU for the filing

Visit Google News for the latest in this sad mess.

Peter Watts's brilliant sf novel "Blindsight" goes CC

Just a couple months after its hardcover debut, this dark, wonderful novel from the mind of Watts is now available via Creative Commons (i.e. free) download. Go read a few pages on his site, download in html/pdf, and enjoy: Blindsight

Full disclosure: I've had the opportunity to workshop with Peter, and I read chunks of this in progress. He brings a professional scientist's brain and a relentlessly realist sensibility to science fiction. This is awesome stuff. Check it out.

SC greenlights Prudence Island School leaseback RFPs

Last night's meeting of the Portsmouth School Committee was the most civil in ages, and not just because Chairperson Wedge announced a renewed adherence to parliamentary procedure and threatened to call the cops if people are disruptive. But that probably helped.

The big item was the Prudence Island School. With just two students currently in this one-room schoolhouse, there have been persistent calls to close the school to save money.

Richard Carpender and the Prudence Island subcommittee reported on the results of their investigation, and while there is not a lot of money to be saved by closing the school (those two students would have to be tuitioned into Bristol, at a cost of $24k) they did some out-of-box thinking and came up with a leaseback approach.

Under the proposal, the Town would transfer the property to one of the several RI historical societies which might be interested, and lease the space back at a pre-determined rate. This would move the maintenance costs out of the school budget, allow for predictable funding, and retain the school as an option in the event there are more kids on the island.

While the School Committee and audience had some questions about the details of the leaseback arrangement (setting a cap on the yearly amount lower than the cost of closing, understanding the total capacity, investigating fire code regs) there was general agreement, and even a note of approval from one of the PCC members in the audience for the subcommittee's work. The SC voted to approve the preparation of RFPs to historical societies, subject to the Town Council's approval.

In tonight's HeaneyWatch™, the Jamester popped into the approval of the SC by-laws with "What happens when a by-law is broken?" Now, I'll admit that I wouldn't have known the answer to that last week, before I started reading Robert's Rules, but shouldn't someone who was already on the Town Council know the answer to that question? Hint: As Doug Wilkie said, you raise a point of order. Faucher added that it can call into question the validity of any action that was taken in contravention of the by-laws. See, for example, RONR (10th ed.), p 106, l. 20-24.

See "An Inconvenient Truth" this Saturday

Al Gore and MoveOn.org have teamed up to spread the word on climate change with viewing parties this Saturday.

If you haven't seen the film, or if you'd like to connect with like-minded folks for a fun evening of greenhouse horror, you can locate and sign up for a party here: AlGore.com

(Do I hear the Oscar® buzz starting?)

Pages