Tomorrow's Town Council: BE THERE!

Tomorrow night's Portsmouth Town Council will have a rich agenda, with several important issues up for discussion and vote. Foremost is a proposed moratorium on building permits for large-scale (greater than around 40K square foot) retail, with some ancillary discussions of legality and process, and a request to amend the maximum allowable retail size. If you're concerned about the potential impact of future big-box retail on our Town, please be there.

And a word to the wise — you might want to show up early. Sources tell me there is a healthy turnout anticipated.

Also on the agenda (which you can get here. I have added an automatic link in the right navigation area to a continuously updated feed from the Secretary of State, so you can always get agendas about 48hrs in advance.) are wastewater, the School Department budget, curbside trash pickup, and a proposal for a bond to fund the Prudence Island school.

If that sounds like a mashup of all the issues we've been dealing with for the whole year, you got it. Plan on a long — and seriously interesting — evening. See you there!

Watch Karen Gleason propose cutting $200K more from the schools

As mentioned in a previous post, during the tentative budget meeting last week, Councilor Karen Gleason called for cutting an additional $200,000 from the Portsmouth School Department budget based on comments by Dr. Lusi about savings realizable through "shared service." After I questioned her about this during the public comments, she called me up to speak with her at the end of the meeting, and vehemently denied that she was referring to cutting the librarian, guidance counselor, and nurse from the elementary schools. Watch her proposing the cut:

However. Unless Gleason has forgotten her own questioning of Lusi from a Council meeting two weeks earlier, she cannot have been ignorant of the nature of these cuts. In the May 16 school budget meeting, Dr. Lusi described, in response to a question from Councilor West, the early budget draft containing these cuts:

Lusi: Not because the Committee or the administration wanted to, but in order to maintain flexibility, we did displace guidance counselors, librarians, and school nurses at the elementary level, and then we laid off the most junior person in each of these categories, which would have given us the option of sharing guidance counselors across two elementary schools, for example. I spoke with the Committee last night, that the elementary principals came forward with a very persuasive presentation to the Finance Subcommittee about all the reasons why we really need these people in the schools, and that was when the schools were still proposed to be K through 4. So with moving the 5th grade, and given all the needs that they put forward, my recommendation to the committee is that we recall the nurses, guidance counselors, and librarians so there would be one in every school.

[Brief off-topic comment by Councilor West redacted]

Canario: Quickly, Mrs. Gleason.

Gleason: Go back just a few seconds ago talking about flexibility. What was your initial cost savings that you projected, had you kept the 5th grad where they were, and shared the teachers, staff positions, that you were thinking?

Lusi: Trying to think. I don't have it costed out including benefits, but if we assume the librarian, the most junior librarian I think is around a step 5 teacher, the most junior nurse, I can't recall if she's a 7...

Gleason: How about a rough estimate, with salary and benefits. Would that have been three positions?

Lusi: Yeah, it would have been three positions and it would have been greater than the 75 thousand dollars.

Gleason: Roughly 150-200 thousand? So you could have probably saved between 150 to 200 thousand dollars, had you left the 5th grade where they were and shared those positions amongst the elementary staff. But it would not have impacted the teachers, as far as the number of teachers teaching the kids.

Lusi: But it would have an enormous impact, as the principals reviewed with the Committee, on the services provided to kids.

Gleason: But not teaching, academic...

Lusi: Actually, guidance counselors and nurses both teach part of the health curriculum at the elemntary schools, and the librarian...

Gleason: (unintelligible)

Lusi: I was getting to that. The librarian is very actively involved in the literacy program and also teaches the technology program.

Gleason: Thank you.

Transcribed at Portsmouth Town Hall, 6/8/07, from Tape TCM Budget - schools, May 16, 2007, Tape 2, Side B, approximately 40 minutes in.

Pretty clear from the above that we're talking about a nurse, guidance counselor, and librarian, no?

Just to be complete, here is the transcript, which you can check against the YouTube clip above, taken from the Cox video of the May 30th meeting, in which Gleason refers specifically to the cuts. The 'alternative B' she refers to is a reduced-fee plan for transfer station stickers:

Gleason: Well I can take a stab at it. I don't really want to do this Mr. Driscoll. I guess I would ask both of you to reconsider, over the next couple hours we're going to be here, don't know if you have another creative way to come up with some money. I will make a motion that we go with Alternative B tentatively, to give you guys an opportunity to rethink this, and passing the elderly, take that right out of the picture for those that are 70 years old and older on the condition that we look at the school department budget and find that 200-thousand dollars cost savings there.

Katzman: (off camera) Second for discussion.

Canario: (off camera) Mr. Katzman?

Katzman: So you're proposing, Ms. Gleason, to approve the revenue page as presented with Alternative B and you plan to cut another 200 thousand dollars from the school department budget after we've already cut them 700 thousand dollars this evening?

Gleason: Mr. Canario can I respond to that?

Canario: Yes you can.

Gleason: Well as you recall we had Dr. Lusi come before us, I asked her [what?] her initial savings cost for um and I don't know how many people understood that dialog, but she had an original plan, a savings, between 150, she said she couldn't remember the number, didn't have her figures with her, but it was between 150 thousand to 250 thousand dollars, that she found herself. She had a plan where she could share services at the elementary level, but what she did was she scratched that plan, and then made the plan to move the fifth grade down to the elementary and it went from there and snowballed and snowballed and snowballed. So if she did in fact go back to her original plan, she's not here in the audience, there could be a potential savings of 200 thousand dollars.

Did you have any difficulty understanding the dialog Gleason had with Lusi two weeks ago? No?

And look at this fascinating rhetorical strategy, eh? It makes Dr. Lusi sound like she's cooked up a scheme, moved the fifth grade as a diversion, created some unstoppable juggernaut bent on screwing the taxpayers out of $200K. No mention of the persuasive presentation by the principals, which proves the decision was not dependent on the 5th grade move; that has just evaporated.

I said to the Council at the meeting, and I'll say it again: school nurses protect medically fragile children (and are our first line of defense against potentially dangerous diseases), guidance counselors ensure behavioral issues and emotional challenges are addressed, and school librarians are the only ones left in our elementary schools who teach technology. There is no doubt in my mind that these were exactly the cuts that Gleason was referring to, and her denial does not square with her comments on the public record. You can go to Town Hall and ask to hear the tapes. (Or you can file a FOIA request for Larry's basement, but that's another story...)

November 2008 is not all that far away, Ms. Gleason. And there are enough elementary school parents to vote out of office people who propose measures which put their kids at risk.


Caveat: I am not a professional transcriptionist. The reproductions above are as faithful as the audio quality permitted.

Portsmouth Schools ink staff pacts, update BEP

The Portsmouth School Committee tonight voted to approve contracts with Local 2669 (TA, clerical and custodial), School Administrators, and the assistant superintendent with locked-in CPI-indexed increases and double the employee contributions to health care co-pays. The overall increase proposed was 3.96% with all future raises capped at a maximum of 3.5%.

"Our largest goal was fiscal responsibility and predictability," said School Superintendent Dr. Susan Lusi. And School Finance Director Chris Tague provided a financial impact statement, with detailed breakdowns of the total cost over the three-year lifespan of the contract under various COLA adjustments. The numbers bear out the effectiveness of the negotiations, showing stable or decreasing total costs, even under worst-case scenarios.

Nevertheless, not everyone was happy. PCC, Inc. President Larry Fitzmorris took the podium and began by complimenting the committee and school department for the financial impact statement, calling it "a tremendous improvement." You could hear the "but" coming (and when you hear Larry's "but" coming, you know it) and it materialized in the form of a RI Supreme Court ruling which he said did not permit administrators to join unions, and that therefore, the School Finance Committee's discussions were something "they should not be doing."

School Committee Attorney Richard Updegrove asked for permission to respond, and pointed out that he personally had obtained an adivisory opinion from the RI Attorney General's office several years ago which clearly held that the case was not applicable to this situation, since the Portsmouth Administrators are a group, not a union. "I was the author of that request," Updegrove said to Fitzmorris, "And your organization precipitated the response."

"I don't remember the advisory opinion coming back," said Fitzmorris.

"I do," replied Updegrove. Hmm. I wonder. Did Larry just forget about that? Or did he think that maybe the School Committee would have been incautious enough to vote on a contract without their lawyer present. On the clock, of course. Just another way the PCC is saving YOU, the taxpayer, money, by forcing officials to jump through their hoops.

In tonight's other major piece of business, the School Committee unanimously approved a major update to the Portsmouth Basic Education Program, a document last updated when Ronald Reagan was President, all four Beatles were alive, and the "Internet" was still run by DARPA. "You might wonder about the adequacy of the document for today's world," noted Lusi.

Then Lusi ran through a PowerPoint deck highlighting the critical nature of educational excellence for economic advancement in an increasingly flat world, with trends and statistics on the job market. According to data from the US Department of Labor, of the job areas with anticipated growth, mainly in the health care and tech sector, all but one (home health aide) require a post-high-school education, with the primary academic preparation that entails.

The School Committee unanimously approved the new Basic Education Plan, and I asked for a softcopy, which I'll post. But just wanted to hit some highlights:

  • Rigorous academic K-12 curriculum in the areas of English, Math, Social Studies, Science, and Foreign Language and cultures, taught in a way that reflects best practices in the field of education, and honors all state and federal mandates.
  • Multiple co-curricular and extra-curricular offerings in the areas of art, music, technical education, health and physical education, athletics, clubs and other areas of the creative and technical arts that honor all state and federal requirements, provide students with the avenues needed to learn the creativity, teamwork and job skills needed for the modern economy
  • Appropriate access to up-to-date technology and other instructional materials, including...the personnel necessary to help student avail themselves of these materials and sufficient instructional supplies to fully access the curriculum.
  • The support services necessary to serve children in the modern age including but not limited to guidance counselors, social workers, psychologists, and nurses such that the emotional and physical health and safety of students is maintained.

It's a major achievement, and I compliment the school department and committee for the wisdom and foresight in putting this together. I feel secure knowing that this protects the integrity of our schools from some on the Town Council who have publicly questioned anything above the State BEP.

The other good news from the meeting was that Chair Sylvia Wedge said that she had spoken with Terrence Kavanaugh, father of Samantha, the high school freshman injured on East Main Road, and that her condition had been upgraded, and she was progressing. She still faces multiple surgeries for several broken bones and faces a long road to recovery, but the news was very encouraging.

PCC Bars Citizen Journalist from Meeting

The Portsmouth Concerned Citizens (PCC), a group that trumpets openness and transparency, refused entry to their advertised meeting to your reporter, a very concerned citizen of Portsmouth. Larry and another guy were standing at the door to the Anthony House, clipboard in hand.

"Is this meeting open to the public, or do I have to join to get in?"

"You have to join," said PCC President Larry Fitzmorris.

Check for PCC"Okay," I said, and pulled out my completed membership form and check for $20.

"But you can't join tonight. We've already made up the list." He started fumbling with his wallet. "You have to send me your application, and then the members have to vote on you."

Hm. "Gee. Have you filed by-laws with the State? Because I looked, and I couldn't find anything."

"I wouldn't say we haven't filed anything with the State," said Larry.

"But you haven't filed by-laws?"

"No." He gave me his card.

Now this is interesting on a couple of levels. I really wonder what's in those by-laws. Since the PCC is a nonprofit corporation, they have to file them with the State eventually. In the meantime, all their newsletters say about membership is a statement of some goals, and then "if you are of the same mind, become a PCC member today!" Since the last goal is "superior public schools," I figured, being like-minded, I could join.

But membership only by secret vote? Isn't this antithetical to the PCC's stated position that "While very few people like to be criticized, the tendency to take hard decisions into the back room is counter to all our interests?"

Now I can understand this in a country club, or an exclusive gated community. Sure, you want to have membership only by the consent of those already "in the club." You wouldn't want any diversity of opinion, or have any sunlight in those dark back rooms.

Hm. Dark back rooms in the Anthony House, too, a residential facility run by the Church Community Housing Corporation that I believe administers Federal housing subsidies. Might be worth looking into...

So while I'm still sending Larry my check, I'm not very hopeful. And if there are any attorneys out there who have a sense of RI corporate law, any off-the-record advice would be welcome. I'm sure they are within their rights as an organization, but by gum, I want to be sure that they're crossing their gosh-darned t's and dotting their blessed i's, in terms of what they need to be filing.

But more than the letter of the law, these folks, if anyone, should be ashamed at not hewing to the spirit of their own propaganda. From their most recent newsletter: "What we do not know, we are unable to challenge. Given the opportunity, the ethically challenged will cho[o]se the closet for decisions that hazard the public good."

Letter: June 26 Meeting on E. Main Traffic Plan

The following is a letter from Carol Dietz, Chair of the Portsmouth Town Center Committee, who worked with the RI DOT to develop the Town Center plan. There's a critical meeting with DOT on June 26, and I urge everyone to read Carol's post, look at the plan, and come to the meeting to press the DOT for action.

The recent tragedy on East Main Road in Portsmouth in which a high school freshman was seriously injured once again points out that something must be done to calm traffic and improve pedestrian safety in the area that runs from Town Hall to the Town Library and includes several shops and senior citizen housing complexes. But getting it done will take the concerted effort of Portsmouth citizens, town officials, and the Rhode Island Department of Transportation.

A few years ago town residents formed a Town Center Committee and took a look at this section of East Main Road with state and national experts to see what could be done to create “a sense of place.” To no one’s surprise high traffic volumes and speed were identified as big barriers to creating a walkable town center. Traffic and planning experts believe the traffic could be tamed by redesigning the road. Working with Portsmouth residents, they came up with a Town Center plan that included traffic calming measures such as roundabouts, landscaped medians, and enhanced pedestrian crosswalks, thus creating a walkable community.

In communities across the country, traffic calming has been proven successful on heavily traveled, four lane streets such as East Main Road. Speeds, accidents and bodily injuries have been dramatically reduced. And, business districts have become healthier as well.

The Town Center Plan, developed in collaboration with state transportation officials, aims to slow speeds on East Main Road by changing the character of the road. It proposed three roundabouts, one at Town Hall, one at the intersection at Clements Market and a third in between. The roundabouts will keep traffic moving rather than creating the huge backup of stopped traffic now experienced at the one existing traffic signal.

Without roundabouts it’s likely more traffic signals will be added at the Brooks/FoodWorks areas as that property is developed, as well as in front of Town Hall. As more traffic signals are added, driver frustration rises and inevitably people drive faster to avoid red lights. The backup from three signals and the desire of most motorists to quickly “get to” the next light so they can “get through” the area would only make the situation worse! Three roundabouts, on the other hand, will keep traffic moving and introduce at least three separate areas that are designed so that a motorist can’t go any faster than 25 mph and pedestrians can cross safely.

Another feature of the Town Center Plan is a landscaped median that separates vehicles traveling in different directions. A median with plantings visually encloses the road, and has been shown to slow down traffic even when a road is still as straight and as wide as before there was landscaping. Creating a median also reduces the number of drivers making left turns and thus reduces accidents.

Pedestrians who cross East Main Rd today do so at considerable risk. There are no crosswalks in slow or stopped traffic areas. Traffic never stops at the intersection in front of Clements Market and, if it did, there would be huge backups as all four traffic signals brought motorists to a complete stop so a pedestrian could safely cross in any of four directions! Instead, three crosswalks are now placed away from that intersection, where crossing is least expected and just where the traffic is speeding up on the straightaway or are at peak speed when traveling down the hill.

Everyone is saying we need to do something NOW. The Town Center Project is the answer, but that will take some time before it will happen. A pedestrian activated stoplight placed somewhere between the bottom of Quaker Hill and the intersection at Clements is the best temporary solution. However, that is just a Band-Aid and not a solution to the overall problem. To have a walkable community we need to do what RIDOT has proposed...change the character of the road. To do this we need the support of the whole community. We need to tell our Legislators that this is a priority!

A public meeting with Rhode Island DOT, the Town of Portsmouth, and the Portsmouth Town Center Committee will be held on June 26 at the Portsmouth High School Auditorium at 7 p.m. to talk about the Town Center plan and proposed design changes to East Main Road. This is your chance to be heard...please come!

Carol A. Dietz
Chairperson
Portsmouth Town Center Committee

Open Letter to the DOT RE: East Main Road

Sent this last week, and cc'd Carcieri. Wanted to give it time to wend its way to Providence, but also wanted to put the DOT and the Governor on public notice that they are running a road through our town which fails to meet Federal standards. (Hey, as Tailgunner Gleason says, "Listen to the State!" Oooh, I need to put that on a T-shirt...)

Jerome F. Williams, Director
Rhode Island Department of Transportation
Two Capitol Hill
Providence, RI 02903

Dear Director Williams,

Conditions on East Main Road in Portsmouth, also known as Route 138, have long been a source of concern for both the local community and your Department, and we thank you for the work you have done for our town in planning for critically needed improvements. But the time for planning is over: action is desperately needed, and soon.

This week, a Portsmouth High School freshman was struck and critically injured only yards from the spot where a senior citizen was killed 18 months ago. And this week’s accident did not involve a drunk driver at night; this was an off-duty police officer in clear afternoon conditions. Strong evidence that this is a design, not human factors issue.

The State Police investigator, Captain James Swanberg and Portsmouth’s Police Chief Lance Hebert are quoted in yesterday’s Providence Journal acknowledging that the "normal flow of traffic" is "35 to 40 miles an hour." You are obviously aware that such speeds are incompatible with uncontrolled pedestrian crossings on 9-12K ADT four-lane roads with no medians (As per Table 11 on Federal Highway Administration Highway Research report (http://www.tfhrc.gov/safety/pubs/04100/04.htm), and yet those are the conditions which exist on this State Highway.

We need the roundabouts your Department has planned for East Main Road, and we need them now. Please let me know what steps RIDOT plans to take. Thank you.

Kind Regards

Ball's in your court, Governor...

Council approves preliminary budget, cuts school warrants

The Portsmouth Town Council approved a preliminary budget of $52.5M this evening, at the Paiva-Weed levy cap of 5.25%, but without warrant money for the Portsmouth School Department capital programs (buildings and IT). School Committee Finance chair Dick Carpender had approached the Council with a compromise, with each group picking up one of the warrants, but he met with a chilly reception from Council President Dennis Canario.

"I'm saddened to hear that you were going to find 30-40K to cover this warrant item when you couldn't keep the Prudence Island School open," said Canario. "I'm very concerned and very upset."

"We're not talking about $75K [the cost of Prudence]," replied Carpender. "We're talking $31K [the amount needed to cover debt service on the warrant]. I came here with a compromise that the committee looked at very seriously."

"Not seriously enough," said Canario. "There's priorities that need to be put in place." The Council proceeded to a vote, and the warrants were out. Canario moved the the next item and Carpender headed for the exit.

I must admit to missing the first half-hour of the proceeding: Hathaway School had their celebration for all the students who completed Principal Chistina Martin's "Journey Through Books," a program that requires kids to read, or have read to them, several hundred pages across major genres, which they then present quick oral reports on to build comprehension. Our first grader, Jack, was one of the more than 80% of the school who completed the journey, the group collectively reading 700,000 pages. All this is made possible by two dozen parent volunteers and support from the Parents Association. It's a model of innovative, community-centered education, and it is one of the gems of the Portsmouth School Department.

When reporters caught up with Carpender in the hallway, he was firm on the numbers. "75K is not 31K," he reiterated. Without the tech warrant money, they would not be able to purchase the updated textbooks for the Math program or even cover the software licensing for the coming year. Taken together, those are over $200K of purchasing that the $31K of debt service provides. Finding the $31 might be possible, but there was just not enough to keep Prudence open.

That shortfall was baked into the budget by the Caruolo process, and the difference between the proposed stipulated agreement and the eventual Superior Court judgement. "That's where we went downhill," said Carpender. "Prudence wouldn't be closed if we hadn't gone to trial."

Meanwhile, the Council was still chewing on the rest of the budget. The next contentious item was solid waste, specifically, the proposal to charge residents who wished to use the transfer station. "We're a rarity in not charging a fee," Town Admin Bob Driscoll pointed out. "This year, we're funding the $590K in the tax rate."

"It's really another form of taxation," whined Tailgunner Gleason.

"It isn't, to be honest," said Driscoll. "A user fee is a cost for a service we don't have to provide." He pointed out that the Town is not legally required to collect trash, and that citizens would be paying $1.8M collectively for that service, so the user fee was a public good.

The initial motion for the fee failed, as did a quite logical move by Len Katzman to simply close the transfer station if they weren't going to fund it. Then Gleason moved to the second alternative, which involved lower user fees with the town picking up $200K.

"Look at the school budget and find $200K there," said Gleason. "Dr. Lusi had a plan, that she said would have saved between $150-200K, she found, to share services at the elementary level."

Now the last part of the sentence above is critical. Go watch the tape. What she was referring to was an early school budget proposal that involved cutting a nurse, counselor, and librarian and having the remaining staff move from school to school on a part-time basis. Cut mental health, put medically fragile students at risk, and close the libraries part of the week. I can't imagine that these are the priorities President Canario suggested that need to be put in place.

When public comment was permitted, I asked Councilor Gleason to square this with her stated position (during the discussion of the lifeguards at Sandy Point) that public safety should be of utmost concern. And she called me over, at the end of the meeting, and emphatically denied that these were the cuts she was referring to. She claimed not to have any specific reductions in mind, only that Lusi had mentioned those numbers. But unless something convenient happens to the tape from this evening, you will hear her say "share services at the elementary level."

I certainly got very upset over nothing, because this alternative didn't pass, and the Council ended up reconsidering the original $100 sticker plan.

Next, the Council moved on to their "provisional" budget, the version which will go to the public next month for hearings. But first, they took public comment. I wish someone from the School Committee had been there, but I got up and said my piece to Gleason. Larry rose to yammer about the State's financial predicament, flat funding to towns, and warning against "shifting the loss of revenue to taxpayers" and "driving up the cost of government" The town needed to "rank basic functions by order of priority." Which, I have to point out, was exactly what Bob Driscoll's budget did, but Fitzmorris had in mind "restructuring the Town's government." It gives me cold fucking sweats to imagine for even ten seconds what living in Larry's Bargain Basement Government would be like. I'm pretty sure it's not a place Jefferson would be comfortable, the PCC's masthead notwithstanding.

Moving on.

The one good piece of news, going into the provisional budget, was that all the tweaking had only pushed the number $49,469 over the cap. And there was, believe it or not, a magic bullet. The Town had been trying to phase out the warrant items on their side — and yes, that means borrowing — but by continuing for one more year, they could cover the $49K and bring the budget back in under the cap.

Canario seemed relieved. "We could save a whole lot of time and do a whole lot of good."

But Jim Seveney wanted to at least explore the other option: exceeding the cap. "Look at what we've done," he said. "We've closed a school. Decimated civic support. Eroded basic services. We're in a hole, and the hole was created by the Financial Town Meeting. The schools made some of that back through the courts, but we have no recourse. I move to add an additional $630K and move back through the budget and provide all the services we historically have."

Gleason was up in arms immediately. "This is the year the council needs to make a decision," she said, urging them to abide by Paiva-Weed. "We need to listen to the State."

Read that last sentence again, and marvel at how the PCC and their apologists can defend the Town Charter when it suits their purposes, yet still cower conveniently before the almighty General Assembly. For people who want to starve the beast and gut local government, what kind of a talking point is "We need to listen to the State?" Can she really utter that sentence with no cognitive dissonance?

McIntyre wasn't going along with exceeding the cap either. He wasn't sure that the money would stay in the general fund and not "go to the schools." And he singled out East Bay Community Action for harsh criticism: "They're double dipping on taxpayers money. Take a look at the salaries they get."

Council President Canario wasn't in favor of the approach either. "At the tent meeting there was a vote taken, and that's what we have to abide by." The motion to exceed the cap failed.

The Council moved in the direction of extending the warrants, which would cover the $49K and put some money back in the depleted general fund. But wait, it ain't over until the guy from Anthony House comes back to ask for more money for senior bus trips.

Yes, as unbelievable is it might seem, he came back. He pointed out that the residents of Anthony House were taxpayers — hear this well, Councilors, they contributed some $51K to the town coffers — and they wanted to get some back.

And even more incredibly, Gleason tried to oblige. She actually made a motion that the Council cut all funding for East Bay Community Action and Newport Community Mental Health, "because they receive Federal funds," and give it to the seniors for their bus trip.

Yes, that's right. Cut all funding for the most challenged in our communities so that a bunch of seniors can go on a bus trip to Maine.

Let me be incredibly blunt. My mother was a low-income senior. In the years before she died, my wife and I had to support her to the tune thousands of dollars a year. We kept her out of state care, and I don't begrudge one penny that we owe because of it. I know there are a lot of other sandwich-generation folks in the same boat, paying for kids and parents. Did I expect the State to pick up her Medicare and Medicaid expenses? Absolutely. Did I expect to see taxpayer dollars go to put her on a bus trip to Maine? No. That is just not something I believe the government should provide.

My mom loved and served this community; she was a nurse who mixed the first batch of penicillin at Newport Hospital. But she never went looking for a handout from the state, and I don't think that advocates of "restructuring town government" ought to find such requests appealing either. This is one area where I have some street cred. Maybe I'll suggest during the hearing that the Council cut the token $500 they gave to Anthony House. I know Mr. Ellis was just trying to represent his folks assertively, but this is not the year to whine about luxuries. (And if Karen Gleason can call the TV studio at the high school a luxury, as she did again tonight, then I call a bus trip a luxury as well.)

Ah, yeah, that's just me, political naif looking for consistency and fairness, when this year, the budget process has had neither. Not through any fault of the Council, but there are external forces at work. I hope Senator Paiva-Weed is aware of the heartrending impact her well-intentioned legislation is causing.

Mercifully, there was no second for Gleason's amendment, so the Anthony House will have to live with the same token $500 given to the far less worthy folks like the Samaritans, Newport County Women's Resource Center, Red Cross, and Visiting Nurse Service.

With a final vote, the Council provisionally approved a budget of $52,525,178, at the levy cap of 5.25%, which would be an actual property tax rate increase of 2.19%.

Council talks wastewater and video

In a churning, agonizing three-hour meeting this evening, the Portsmouth Town Council spent a few minutes on weighty issues (wastewater, financial benchmarking) and what seemed like an eternity on a proposal to pay someone to videotape their meetings. At about the midpoint of the evening, there were about 35 people there — including, incomprehensibly, a whole gang of Boy Scouts who probably got a civics lesson they'll never forget.

"You were the only reporter here tonight," Councilor Pete McIntyre said to me after the meeting. "Guess that makes me the newspaper of record," I replied. But not being a "newspaper," I get to be all self-referential in my second-graf quote.

Not that the papers missed all that much. The evening started with a wastewater update from Mike Schrader, the project manager at Woodard & Curran developing the facilities plan for the November sewer referendum. The Council spent about fifteen minutes peppering him with questions about the timeline and deliverables. Then Citizen Phil Driscoll took the podium and attempted to poke holes in the whole process.

"I've spoken to you people in the past about sewerage that doesn't work," said Driscoll. "Areas recently sewered that still have contamination — Narrow River. Middletown, Newport, half-a-dozen sewerage communities are under EPA guidance or scrutiny."

Jay Manning of the RI DEM got up to respond. "Middletown's problem is not because they sewered, but because they deferred maintenance." Then Driscoll got into the litany of other places. Were they all "deferred maintenance." No, Manning replied, there were some wildlife control issues.

The Council seemed satisfied, but Driscoll chased Manning and Schrader out into the hallway, continuing to harangue them until Town Clerk Viera-Boudin came out and asked everyone to be quiet. I followed, just to hear the kind of Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt that is likely to be circulated in advance of the sewer bond. (As I always do, I will say here that I live in Island Park and have a strong point of view: we need sewers.)

"This town seems drawn to cans of worms," said Driscoll, pointing to the Town Hall fiasco, among others, and arguing that sewers were comparable. He pecked away at the numbers in the W&C report, and what would happen if we cleaned up the North end only to be the beneficiary of pollution from Tiverton and Fall River. Schrader had ready answers, and was quite open to the dialogue, and they probably talked for about fifteen minutes.

By the time I got back into the TC session, Faucher and a Mr. Schaefer, who appeared to be an outside consultant, were reviewing the Town's financial benchmarks. The high points: Portsmouth should consider moving their municipal employees to the State pension plan, both because it provides more stable and predictable costs, and also because it would allow the town to attract candidates from other cites within RI already in the system. There was also discussion of the state of the fund balance, which, comapred with other RI towns, is dangerously low, in the 3-4% range, compared to many towns with 8-10%, and some as high as 14. "Portsmouth," noted Schaefer, "is not one of them," leading to serious risks should there be a fiscal emergency (like asbestos discovered at a school.) The bottom line: the town did the right thing issuing a supplemental tax bill to pay the Caruolo decision rather than dipping into our depleted reserves.

Then came the video question. It seemed an innocuous agenda item: Request to award contract: Video Recording Services. The Council, ages ago, had asked Admin Bob Driscoll and Finance Director Dave Faucher to look into it, and they came back with an estimate that it would cost about $135/meeting from the one respondent to their RFP.

Pete McIntyre immediately moved to kill the proposal. "I was under the impression that everything was moving right along. Why are we spending $15K when we have a system that's working right now?"

Tailgunner Gleason got out her wagging finger. "I'm disappointed to see this brought forward to us. The PCC have been taping our meetings for 4-and-a-half years, a great service to our community, and it is working very well."

It was left to Councilor Len Katzman to be the voice of reason. "I am supportive of the Council taking responsibility for its own open meetings," he said. "It's our responsibility to put in place a system that people can feel is unbiased."

Now, because I am not the "newspaper of record," I can give a concrete example. At last week's school committee meeting, the PCC showed up ready to tape as someone who they acknowledged as one of their members, Jeff Richard, let loose a five-minute diatribe about negotiating the administrator's contract. I was there, and I would have blogged it then, but I was too depressed by the E. Main accident. But here's the nut: the school committee attorney urged them not to comment, and they explained that they were not going to discuss anything Richard said. But because the PCC was there to film him, he gets five minutes of airtime, unanswered, to spew questionable advice like suggesting that we pay experienced hires less simply because a comparable first-year hire would get less money and suggesting that we only have one-year contracts.

The PCC, knowing that contract negotiations are ongoing, euchered the School Committee into allowing one of their members address an issue, on video, to which the Committee was legally prohibited from responding. Does that instill confidence in their unbiased role behind the lens?

And yes, I realize the irony of my calling attention to bias. Hey, folks, say it with me: "Blogs are not newspapers." But even I have scruples. I haven't mentioned Mr. Buddemeyer's secret nickname, have I? You'll have to watch the video...

Jim Seveney tried to find some middle ground. "An official committee to serve the needs of public access," he suggested, "to be supported by a professional under contract." Bill West pointed out that the PCC solicited money by mentioning that one of the things they did was recording Town Council meetings. "I want to take politics out of the process," he said.

Larry, naturally, got up to reply. "It's a complicated process," he said, settling into the podium for a good long time in front of the camera, "We will not use the camera for political purposes." He stressed accountability. "I'm the manager of the system," he said, and pointed out that the PCC had donated over $10K of value. "You," he said to the Council about the video committee proposal, "Couldn't find any volunteers."

Tailgunner Gleason — mirabile dictu — echoed the PCC's sentiments. "Let's use some basic common sense. and go forward with what we're doing. We should appreciate and thank our volunteers."

Given the budget realities, there was no way a proposal to pay for taping was going to fly, and it was voted down. And as I admitted to Pete McIntyre after the meeting, I appreciate the service that the PCC provides. Yes, they benefit because they get to stand up and say stuff on TV, but they pay their dues: they show up and tape the meetings. And I know how hard that is. You know me. I'm not sucking up to the PCC. But I have to give credit where it's due.

In a perfect world, the local cable company would be required to cover all municipal meetings as part of their contract before being given monopoly rights in the town. But that's just me, being all idealistic.

The sad thing is that the School Committee, the Superintendent, and the school Finance Director were all sitting around, waiting for the tentative approval process that never happened; they got bumped to tomorrow night, and ended up leaving after the video quagmire. I believe the Council spend over a half hour discussing this proposed $5K contract, but I confess that my sense of time suffers when I'm trying to capture quotes. You can watch Channel 18 with a stopwatch and correct me.

After a few minor agenda items — a DPW leave of absence, buying a road compactor, a propane contract for Melville, and a refurb for one of the fire trucks, the meeting adjourned about 9:30.

Tell them what you think: Target, RI DOT, PCC

Hope you had a good holiday and came back to work well-rested and ready to address some envelopes, because here are some opportunities to send your thoughts about key Portsmouth issues. All you have to do is fill in some info and drop 'em in the mailbox. Don't forget that the postage rates went up — if you're like me, and you still have a mess of 39-cent stamps, the Post Office will be happy to sell you a sheet of two-centers.

From Conni Harding, Preserve Portsmouth:
This is our petition, which as your sheets fill up need to be mailed in an envelope and addressed EXACTLY the way the address is on the letterhead. This will ensure that the Town Clerk will make copies for all of the Town Councilors. [Right-click to download]

Also, please remember the following dates for the 2 next big meetings: Town Council on Monday June 11, Preserve Portsmouth is on the agenda. And the Design Review Board meeting Tuesday July 10th 7:00 pm, Portsmouth Middle School.

East Main Road:
As it says over the the left-hand column on this site, please take a minute to send your thoughts to the RI Department of Transportation. We need to get them to take action on East Main before there are any more accidents and injuries. I cc'd my letter to Governor Carcieri, and I'll post it here as an example as soon as I'm sure it made it to Providence.

Portsmouth Concerned Citizens:
The PCC's latest newsletter has a poll to find out what the citizens of Portsmouth are most concerned about. Is it "unrealistic union salaries," "development density that sewers will bring," or the "$100/yr fee for dump to circumvent tax cap?" I have a feeling that readers of this blog might have other priorities to share with the PCC, and all it costs is a 41-cent stamp. You can download the poll from their site and add some of your suggestions on the blank lines provided (How about, say, fixing East Main Road and preserving Portsmouth's unique character? Just a suggestion. Vote early, vote often.)

Memorial Day memories and grief

Andrew J. Bacevich is a professor of political science at Boston University and an outspoken critic of the Bush Administration's policies. Bacevich is also a bereaved parent who recently lost his son in Iraq. His piece in yesterday's Washington Post is worth reading as we remember those who sacrificed, and those left behind, this Memorial Day.

Parents who lose children, whether through accident or illness, inevitably wonder what they could have done to prevent their loss. When my son was killed in Iraq earlier this month at age 27, I found myself pondering my responsibility for his death.

Among the hundreds of messages that my wife and I have received, two bore directly on this question. Both held me personally culpable, insisting that my public opposition to the war had provided aid and comfort to the enemy. Each said that my son's death came as a direct result of my antiwar writings.

This may seem a vile accusation to lay against a grieving father. But in fact, it has become a staple of American political discourse, repeated endlessly by those keen to allow President Bush a free hand in waging his war. By encouraging "the terrorists," opponents of the Iraq conflict increase the risk to U.S. troops. Although the First Amendment protects antiwar critics from being tried for treason, it provides no protection for the hardly less serious charge of failing to support the troops -- today's civic equivalent of dereliction of duty.

What exactly is a father's duty when his son is sent into harm's way?

Among the many ways to answer that question, mine was this one: As my son was doing his utmost to be a good soldier, I strove to be a good citizen.
Read the whole op-ed

Pages