Portsmouth Biz Expo Tonight!

PBA logoMeet the folks behind Portsmouth's local economy — the members of the Portsmouth Business Association (PBA) — at their Expo and Showcase today from 4-7pm at the Glen Manor House. Co-sponsored by "Friends of the Glen Manor House," the event will feature displays by local businesses, with plenty of time to chat and network.

Also on hand this evening will be members of the PHS Junior Business Association, who worked with the PBA on the event. A big tip of the hat to the next generation of savvy Portsmouth PBA-ers.

Show your support, and get to know your local business folks — look forward to seeing you there!

Tuesday Budget workshop: Lifeguards saved, PCC lost

In a civil, orderly two-hour workshop tonight, Administrator Bob Driscoll continued presenting the proposed FY08 budget to the Portsmouth Town Council and an audience of about 18 citizens. Driscoll sat at a long table facing the Council, and as items were discussed, the department head responsible for the relevant item would take their place in the hot seat beside him.

I feel the need to paint a word picture because none of the massive technical expertise of the PCC and their crew of video folks managed to show up. Hmm. I wonder if it could have had something to do with this being the first Tuesday of the month, their meeting night? No, couldn't be. They wouldn't blow off their promise to bring transparency to the dark backward and abysm of Town Hall just so they could indulge in a Troll-spew fueled, consensual hallucination about their next Tent Meeting, could they? Eh?

The Fire Department budget was up first, and despite massive overtime numbers, the Council voiced their reluctance to entertain additional hires. Because overtime is spotty, they would have to hire 4 firefighters, at a cost of $240K in order to eliminate about half of the overtime (about 200K, so essentially, spending 240 to save 100.) In one of the lighter moments, Tailgunner Gleason had to have the difference between fiscal and calendar years pointed out to her.

With David Dolce, the tax assessor, Driscoll explained the opportunities that come with setting tax policy. Take the farmland exemption, which forgoes about $560K in potential tax revenue. While that might seem like easy money to grab, Driscoll reminded the Council, "You're investing in preserving farmland, which you would otherwise be buying for open space, or paying for the services if there are new houses." The Council tasked Dolce with thinking about a workshop to look at the Town's tax exemption structure.

DPW painted a fairly grim scenario. With 90 miles of road in Portsmouth, and a lifespan of 30 years, about 4.5 miles of road needs repaving each year, but budget constraints have kept the Town to a fraction of that over the last few years. You will not be surprised to learn that timely repaving by putting a topcoat of asphalt on a mildly worn road costs only 89K/mile. Wait until the road is so far gone it needs full resurfacing, and that balloons to $258K/mile. The lesson of the Sakonnet River Bridge should not be lost on anyone here, and the Council actively discussed the notion of floating a bond.

In what was the most emotional moment of the evening, the lifeguards at Sandy Point took their seats next to Driscoll to argue for the 50K allocation that keeps the beach protected over the summer. Councilor Len Katzman read into the record the story of Sandy Point lifeguards saving a kayaker just two summers ago, and urged the Council to find the money. "This goes to the fabric of what Portsmouth is. I would hope that we are a town that wants lifeguards at our beach."

Tailgunner saw this as an opportunity for some free piling on. "I'm surprised you took 50K out of this particular budget. I would like to mandate public safety as the first priority of this town."

I intend to personally ask Councilor Gleason about this commitment a week from Monday when the School budget comes up and we have to talk about cutting a nurse from the elementary schools.

The Council did end up tentatively approving the 50K, but Jim Seveney asked Driscoll to do some analysis about options for getting Sandy Point to a self-sustaining point.

Only two bright spots this evening: Melville Campground and the Glen Manor House. Richard Wimpress noted that since 1992, the Manor house "has contributed more than 800K to the town." Although it shows up as a cost item in the budget, he wanted to be very clear that on the revenue side, it more than pays for itself, returning 75% of receipts to the Town general fund (the rest is used for maintenance and updates.) That is one of the jewels of Portsmouth, and a star performer financially.

Meeting was continued to May 16th, when the School budget discussion takes center stage; the next meeting, the "civic support" items, will be on May 21st.

Guestblog: Monday Night Budget Workshop

Note: The Wednesday budget workshop for the School Committee has been rescheduled to May 16, so if you want to come to a budget workshop, tonight is it.

Thanks to guesblogger Mark Katzman for this report on the first workshop:

There were no fireworks at the budget meeting last night. The council approved, or rather "tentatively approved" all the budget proposals submitted by the Town Administrator, Fire Chief and Police Chief. However, the council in general did not find the proposal for a couple of new firefighters or a couple of new police very compelling, and final approval is not certain. The chiefs made an extremely good case for how we are currently getting by with just the very barest minimal staffing but they raised serious concerns about the town’s ability to manage with the upcoming increased needs imposed by, among other things, the various west-side developments. In addition, new police would not decrease the current overtime costs, because most overtime is personnel-specific (i.e., after an arrest, the arresting officer has duties that require overtime). However, additional fire personnel would decrease current overtime costs.

Jim Seveney may have said it best when he said that he agreed with the Chiefs, but said that given our current financial situation, even though we can easily predict increased needs and it would be nice to be pro-active, we may just have to deal with those needs when they actually arise. In addition, we have not yet worked out developer-impact agreements such as having the Marina to be built on the west side contribute to the cost of additional harbor master duties.

Mr. Fitzmorris took to the podium only once, making a show of cross-examining Dave Faucher, Town Finance Director. However, Mr. Faucher had a ready answer for every question. Larry scored no points, and appeared a bit dejected.

The head of the DPW has not yet spoken to the council, and will do so tonight.

Please note that now is the time for anyone who wants to object to any line item to speak up. There were very few people in attendance last night — About 15 people total. Note that the righteousness of complaining LATER is severely diminished for those who don't voice their concerns about the budget NOW (tonight).

Preserve Portsmouth gears up

Preserve Portsmouth meetingMore than 50 residents traded suggestions, e-mail addresses, and an occasional tirade against the planned Target development at a meeting of the local group, Preserve Portsmouth, this evening at the Green Valley Country club.

One of the guest speakers was Gail Greenwood, a leader of the anti-sprawl group Middletown First, and she brought along a killer visual aid, a photo taken by David Hansen of the Newport Daily News, showing signage along a stretch of West Main Road we're probably all too familiar with.

Middletown"The last thing Aquidneck Island needs," said Greenwood, "Is another Middletown."

Committees were formed to deal with fundraising, research, and communications, and tentative plans were laid out for a "Yard Sale on Steroids," to build awareness in late June. Also — expect bumper stickers soon. Yay.

There will be a PO box, but in the meantime, check out the Preserve Portsmouth site for information on where to send donations.

Lusi briefs PTOs on School Budget

At an informational session this afternoon, Portsmouth School Superintendent Dr. Susan Lusi briefed representatives from the PTO and school booster organizations on the FY2008 budget, scheduled to be presented to the Town Council on May 16. The bottom line, as those who have followed the meetings know, is that the budget, with only a 3.96% increase, comes in under the cap.

"In any other year, you'd be a hero," said one PTO leader. Despite much remorse over the need to close Prudence Island, there was general approval for the strategy of making cuts in ways that impacted students the least.

All is not well, however. According to the preliminary Town budget, there is a plan to cut the so-called "warrant items," which are earmarked funds on the Town side for capital expenditures like school maintenance and technology. The revenue side of the school budget could not absorb that kind of hit — potentially, about 350K — without additional reductions.

What would that mean? No way to know, really, other than that there is not $350K of fat in this budget. And in many ways, the cleverness of Dr. Lusi and the School Committee at finding areas that don't affect students are, perversely, working against them. Not like what would happen if they threatened to slash athletics, AP courses, or band.

"The result of making cuts the way we have, without impacting kids," said Lusi, "Is that you don't have people in the streets."

The PTOs and booster representatives were unanimous in their determination to do whatever it takes to make up what they can, but the public, parents especially, should take a look at the budget (which will soon be available on the School web site) and plan to show up at the May 16 meeting when it's presented to the Council.

I was in the audience at the bitter School Committee meeting where the decision was made to close Prudence Island. A word to the wise for all my fellow parents: let's be there this time before any decisions are finalized.

Once we lose something in this budget climate, it's gone forever.

Meetings, Meetings, Meetings: Town Budget, Preserve Portsmouth

This will be a busy meeting week at Town Hall, with three nights of Budget Workshops (7 pm, Monday through Wednesday). Tonight's meeting kicks off at 6 to wrap up the Wastewater discussion from last week.

You can see the schedule and download a PDF of the proposed budget. (Goes right to the budget page, no blinking Java applet or frames. Did I mention how much those suck? I wish someone on the Town Council would take their Web site as seriously as Tailgunner Gleason takes the sound system. I'm publicly volunteering to serve on a committee to fix the damned thing.)

Also tonight, and why I won't be at the budget-a-go-go this evening, Preserve Portsmouth members (and anyone interested) will be meeting at the Green Valley Country Club on Union Street 7:00pm, Monday.

Please, if you can, be somewhere. This week matters.

Play ball!



Team McDonald'sPortsmouth Little League kicked off today with kids from the Challenger Division throwing out the ceremonial first pitch. With 52 teams, it was a packed opening day ceremony that filled the field behind the Aquidneck Christian Academy. Many thanks to all the sponsors, and especially all the volunteer staff and coaches for sharing our national pastime the the next generation. Here's to a great, fun season!

RI DEM Director tells Council "You Need to Sewer"

Michael Sullivan, Director of the RI Dept. of Environmental Management, delivered a blunt assessment on the North end of Portsmouth to the Town Council and about 25 residents in an occasionally heated 2-hour wastewater workshop tonight.

"You need to sewer three specific areas," said Sullivan. "You need to remove the waste from the region and process it. You are at a ripe time for a bold advance toward solutions."

At issue are the usual suspects — Island Park, Portsmouth Park, and Common Fence Point — and the Council tiptoed right up to making a decision to apply for state grant money and low-interest loans to fund an engagement with the wastewater engineering firm, Woodard & Curran, which did the most recent study. The goal would be a full "facility plan," a detailed description of the proposed solution, with accurate cost estimates, which could inform the preparation of a bond referendum for the November ballot. Sullivan made it clear that time was of the essence.

"Addressing your problems will not become cheaper with time," he said, adding that one thing at risk the 90K in DEM grant money — half of what the facility plan would cost, the rest to be picked up with 3-year, 1% interest loans. "The 90K is not on the table forever," he said, "And we're only willing to invest money in a full facilities plan, and along the [current] trajectory."

There was still doubt on the Council about whether the "trajectory" inevitably ends up at sewers. Council Vice President Jim Seveney again raised the issue of actual versus potential threat. "This report says the water [offshore] is clean," he said. "We're measuring 60 outflows right now, and the samples are over at URI."

This is a critical point. Apparently, the DEM themselves have failed to find high E. Coli counts in the offshore water measurements. I asked Angelo Liberti, DEM Chief of Surface Water Protection, and he said that while the offshore measurements failed to show anything, there were samples at the outflow pipes above the limits. And these are not measurements of street runoff, these are dry weather readings as well. "Those pipes are not watertight," he said, indicating that ground water, contaminated by failing septic systems or cesspools was leaking into them.

DEM Director Sullivan echoed this concern. It was a question of "loading," or how much the relatively thin permeable soil layer typical in Northern Portsmouth could hold. Essentially, the top layer of soil is a sponge, holding and gradually dispersing the waste material discharged into it, and the only real way to mitigate the problem is to sewer and stop the loading. "I see no way around it," he told me. "I wish I did. I'm a small town government guy."

Yeah, maybe the offshore readings are negative. As Carl Sagan used to say, "Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence." I may not be a soil scientist, but my ingoing hypothesis is that if you are putting 742 households worth of waste water into a thin layer over a relatively slow-permeable substratum, eventually plumes of contaminated water will find their way to the Bay. And the patience of the DEM seemed to be wearing thin.

"Don't force us to a greater level of enforcement," said Sullivan. "You have three consultants who have all reached the same conclusion. My offer still stands."

Action on applying for the DEM grant and engaging Woodard & Curran was continued until Monday night at 6pm, pending consultation by Town Solicitor Kevin Gavin. Jack Callahan and Jeff Hatcher lobbied the Council to consider an alternate treatment scheme and argued that the RFP for the Woodard & Curran work didn't include a follow-on piece, and this should be put out to bid, a process that could take another six weeks and kill the chance to have a bond before the voters in November.

Councilor Seveney was acutely aware of the ticking clock presented by the DEM folks in the room. "You're the guys with the hammer," he joked.

Sullivan calmly replied, "The hammer is there for you to pick up to drive the solution."


As I've warned before, I live in Island Park, so take this as biased reporting.

I'm not thrilled with the potential for a $2,000/year sewer bill, but I find that more palatable than spending $30K, a significant fraction of the value of my 900-square-foot cottage, on a septic system that the DEM might decide (seems to have already decided?) doesn't solve the problem. What do YOU think?

Preserve Portsmouth news: Design Review postponed, meet Monday

Public Service Announcement: posting a note I got from Christine Jenkins and Conni Harding...

We have been informed by the Design & Review Committee that next Tuesday's meeting with The Target Corp. will be postponed until Tuesday, June 5th at 7:00pm. Apparently Target's architects are not ready to present their revised design. If you could please notify anyone that you know who does not have email and was planning on attending, we would appreciate it.

Preserve Portsmouth members and anyone else interested in joining us are still planning on meeting at Green Valley Country Club on Union St., Monday evening at 7:00pm, April 30. This is a very important meeting as we all need to come together and share all of our recent research, new developments, and perspective on how we best move forward.


Look forward to seeing you all there!

Tags: 

Guestblog: More on Monday Night's Town Council/Charter meeting

From an anonymous guestblogger:
Then finally at 8:15pm we began the charter amendments discussion...

Mr. McIntyre had no proposed amendment as his "childless" lawyers apparently rethought. Ms. Gleason finally had her amendment all ready with several copies to hand out to the audience (but they weren't available at the beginning of the meeting at the podium) I was lucky enough to get one of the last copies...so I don't believe folks behind me were able to view what we were talking about.

Mr. Canario began the discussion with his thoughts about tagging a charter item to a state law and we went from there. Mr. Katzman spoke as did Sal Carceller and others and the discussion centered on how can you choose just one part of the state law RIGL 44-5-2 (b) only and not concern yourself with the other 5 parts of that law, as well as the fact that the Gleason proposal only addressed cutting the budget should it exceed the cap. What if people felt the budget and it's tax rate were too high but it didn't exceed the cap, or if however unlikely, the people felt the budget wasn't meeting their needs and it should be raised to say meet the cap? No provisions for those scenarios or others.

Ms. Gleason announced in the beginning that she requested input to this proposal and received it from Eugene Love. So Mr. Love felt he needed to stand up and defend his part in it and then launch a salvo about how we need a charter review committee, this is verging on illegal action, what are we trying to do here? Mr. Katzman had earlier stated that the majority if not all of the council members had run on a platform of getting rid of the tent meeting so that's what they were doing. Mr. Love said proudly that he was alone among the candidates (participating in the candidate forum) in not endorsing removal of the tent meeting say that indeed he ran on having a full charter review done, etc. Interestingly no one pointed out that could be one reason he was not elected to the council.

There were attacks, stalling tactics, revisiting the "Carceller Amendment" as if Mr. Carceller wrote it on a napkin and it's being pinned to the ballot. Mr. Canario gave Larry Fitzmorris the opportunity to speak to his Charter Amendment proposal so Mr. Fitzmorris came to the podium and got right to attacking the council, Mr. Carceller's Amendment, the haste we were moving at, the legality of the whole process and how unethical the council is etc. etc. etc. He DEMANDED a vote then and there from the council as to whether they were thowing out the whole charter review process. Mr. Canario again asked if he'd like to speak about his amendment proposal, to which Mr. Fitzmorris replied, "on behalf of the PCC I withdraw" it.

Before being seated Mr. Fitzmorris managed to tell us that the PCC is a group with 415 members. Then a member of the audience requested clarification as to how to vote if they don't want the charter changed. Vote "no" to the amendment(s), reject them, says Mr. Canario and we are back to where we are now. Simple, easy, and apparently what will be their tactic if they really don't want the "Carceller Amendment" to the Charter.

Sal Carceller made some more excellent points about how little the amendment will really change things, simply getting the vote out of the tent and into a booth. Another woman spoke well about how appalled she was by the Tent meeting and finds the council to be indeed acting in the interests of the people etc.

Finallly Mr. Canario recognized Vern Gorton to come to the podium. Mr. Gorton introduced himself as an attorney with children in school, so knowing his words will be somehow suspicious he'll say them anyway (chuckle from Councilman McIntyre). He reminded us all that the "Carceller Amendment" while representing a lot of thought and hard work by Mr. Carceller and others was indeed a legally drafted document by the Town's Solicitor with aid and input from the Town's Registrar of Voters and and was duly discussed, debated and voted on by the council. (Mr. McIntyre had earlier tried the tactic that because the original agenda the night they voted didn't say they were going to vote on it only that we were requesting the next step, that the vote was illegal and they had no right to do it. — That got about 5 minutes and then was put to sleep)

So after approximately 1.5 additional hours of debate and discussion on this charter amendment issue, a vote was taken and Ms. Gleason's amendment did not pass to be put forth to the public for a vote. Therefore as it stands the charter change amendment vote will be either yes change the charter to reflect moving the voting to a special election style vote with all day voting booths and absentee ballots or reject it and keep the status quo.

The vote to put the special election for this amendment up ASAP was shot down for a few reasons. The figure stated for a special election is now $25K. We didn't have enough in the budget to give $100 to the PHS Prom Committee to aid in the after prom party so we had no money for a special election until the new budget cycle. Then in the new budget there is money specified for 2 special elections (anything before Nov. would be 3) so once Mr. West pointed that out, he couldn't support Mr. Katzman in trying to push it earlier than Nov.

Other notes — Mr. Seveney tried to get Finance Director Faucher to take some of his "lofty salary" as a councilmen to give to the Prom Committee. And while at first Mr. Faucher seemed to think this was fine, Town Administrator Driscoll said it could not be done. Councilors were encouraged to make private donations, as was the general public when Mr. Katzman read the letter from PHS Prom Committee into the record.

Most of the people had by now left but item #3 of new business kept us riveted to our seats expecting fireworks.

"Request Authorization: To Exceed the Tax Levy Cap fr FY 2007 - 08 Budget" — It was surprisingly smooth. Mr. Canario said a few times about how this wasn't a vote to exceed the cap but a vote to seek authorization from the State as part of the process required should we need to look at exceeding it. Mr. Seveney talked a bit about the $400K for town-wide revaluation that's going on and how the state was considering removing that from the figuring of our levy and other things that just weren't going to be moved on by the State House until it was too late for our budget process by the look of it and so we'd need to proceed with a step like this.

No discussion from the audience, the vote was taken and passed, 6-1 with Ms.Gleason voting nay.

It was late, I'd had enough and that's all folks.


Many, many thanks to my anonymous friend for such a detailed recollection of a pivotal meeting in Town history. I owe you one.

As soon as I'm back in town I'll find and post contact info to send donations to the PHS Prom Committee (if anyone reading this knows, just send me feedback with the link at left and I'll post. Thanks.)

Tags: 

Pages